User talk:Josve05a

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Josve05a.

This is the user talk page of Josve05a, where you can send messages and comments to Josve05a.

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

• Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
• Put new text under old text.
• New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
• Click here to start a new topic.

	SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day. The latest archive is located at Archive 15.

DR close

No offense but you should have left it someone else considering the multiple disagreements we have gotten in over the subject, including that file and the uploader of it. There's absolutely no reason what-so-ever that it can't be left to another admin. It comes off as POV involved editing when you got in a disagreement about it with me, wrote the pro AI generated image thing on your talk page, and then go around closing the exact same DRs that we got in the disagreement about as keep. Just leave them alone and let another admin close them. Its not that hard to not do involved editing. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Having an opinion on copyright law is not involved editing. Stating that on my user page that COM:INUSE equals in scope is not involved editing. As stated in my recent edit summary: If another admin disagrees with the closure, they can re-open - the closure is an admin action. Feel free to take me to AN if you feel it was inappropriate. This was open for more than 3 months without closure. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:08, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

That's not all you did. Your being disingenuous about it. You got in an argument with me about these specific files and the uploader multiple times and then advocated for me to be indefed over it. That's not just "having an opinion on copyright." I can't take you ANI because I'm topic banned. Otherwise I probably would. I think a reasonable middle ground here since I agree that it's been open for a while is you posting a close request on the admin board. That's usually how people deal with DRs they want to be closed. Is there a reason you can't just do that instead? --Adamant1 (talk) 21:12, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Just for what it's worth, IMO a quite harmful precedent for an issue we're only going to see more of. Effectively legitimizes any "dear chatgpt, create a new version of [copyrighted work] that 'isn't copyrighted' because it 'only copies the ideas' [but which we'll use specifically to represent that copyrighted work]". — Rhododendrites ^talk |  22:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

I agree this is likely something we’ll be seeing more of, and that's exactly why we need to assess each case individually. Some AI-generated works may indeed cross the line into copyright violation, but others may not, depending on how much protectable expression is actually carried over. A blanket approach either way would be unhelpful. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

File:Far Eastern Air Transport (FAT) Boeing 737-222 B-2603 at Hualien Airport (HUN) on 18 July 1980.jpg

Author of this image is Henk Geerlings. However, the permission ticket sent by Martijn Geerlings, as the author passed away, and Martijn is his son, on behalf of the original author, sent ticket email to add permission. Tô Ngọc Khang (talk) 03:42, 30 July 2025 (UTC)